Home > Article > Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus—Diagnosis and Management
Retina/Vitreous
Read Time: 10 mins

Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus—Diagnosis and Management

Published Online: April 11th 2013 US Ophthalmic Review, 2013; 6(2):119–124 DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/USOR.2013.06.02.1
Authors: Antoine Rousseau, Tristan Bourcier, Joseph Colin, Marc Labetoulle
Quick Links:
Abstract
Article
Article Information
Abstract:
Overview

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infections are widely distributed in the general population. The lifetime risk of herpes zoster is estimated to be 10–20 %, increasing with age (1–4). Since herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) accounts for 20 % of all locations of shingles, the lifetime risk of HZO is about 1–2 %. The management of ocular complications of VZV infection is now well codified, but sequellae still can occur, despite an armamentarium effective in limiting viral replication and its immune consequences.

Keywords

Herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO), keratitis, post herpetic neuralgia

Article:

Pathophysiology—The Three Phases of Varicella Zoster Virus Infection
The Primary Infection
This mostly occurs during childhood and early years of adult life. Varicella zoster virus (VZV) is a highly contagious infection and spread by both respiratory droplets and direct contact. Primary infection begins with oropharyngeal infection followed by viremia, which leads to the diffusion into the skin (chickenpox) and the nervous system where VZV may ultimately establish a latent infection. Extracutaneous manifestations are infrequent and include neurologic, pulmonary, hepatic and ocular complications. They are rare and proteiform, including conjunctivitis, episcleritis, dendritic keratitis and/or stromal non-necrotic, sclerokeratitis, anterior uveitis, or retinitis.4 However, most primary infections remain asymptomatic. Primary varicella infection during pregnancy can rarely result in intrauterine infection of the fetus, presenting as congenital varicella syndrome with micromelia, microcephaly, skin scarring, and dysautonomic syndrome.5 Recently, the varicella vaccine has significantly modified the epidemiologic data in countries where vaccination is usual. In the US, the number of severe cases of varicella (i.e. with neurologic or pulmonary lesions) was reduced by 90 % since the vaccine was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1995.4

Latency and Clinical Quiescence
VZV has the capacity to become latent in the nervous system. Studies based on molecular biology techniques have shown that almost all people over 60 years are latently infected with VZV.6 Although numerous neurologic tissues have been described as sites of latency for VZV, the sensory neurons of the trigeminal and spinal sensory ganglia seem particularly affected.7

Viral Reactivations
At the biologic level, they occur fairly frequently, but are most often quickly controlled by the immune system, according to the model originally described by Hope-Simpson.8 The clinical episodes of reactivation (shingles) occur when the immune system is not efficient enough. This explains the increased frequency of herpes zoster with age and/or with other causes of immunosuppression (immunosuppressive treatment, HIV infection, cancerous conditions).

Compared with the number of latently infected neurons, reactivation of VZV is a rare event. It occurs in the sensory ganglia of the clinically affected dermatomes. Herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) corresponds to a reactivation in the trigeminal ganglia. During reactivation, a new phaseof viremia can lead to atypical presentations with multifocal visceral complications,4,9 or conversely without cutaneous signs (zoster sine herpete),10–12 among which anterior uveitis or necrotizing retinitis.13–15

Epidemiology
In countries where large-scale vaccination is not recommended, chickenpox mainly affects people under 20 years with an annual incidence estimated between 1.3 and 3.4 per 1,000 people. For shingles, the annual incidence increases with age. It ranges from around one per 1,000 people among persons 20 to 30 years to 11 per 100 in people over 70 years.3,16 Age is the major risk factor for shingles. The incidence grows rapidly after 60 years1 and it reaches 50 % in patients over 85 years who had not been previously affected.8,17 Immunosuppression is a risk factor of recurrent herpes zoster, which incidence rises from 2 to 4 % in the general population to 25 % among severely immunocompromised patients.4,18 The lifetime risk for herpes zoster is estimated to be 10–20 %.2Since HZO accounts for 20 % of all locations of shingles, the risk for HZO is between about 1 and 4 % over a lifetime.

Presentation
General and Dermatologic Signs
The prodromal phase of HZO usually includes an influenza-like illness with fatigue, malaise, and low-grade fever prior to the development of unilateral rash over the forehead, upper eyelid, and nose (the first division of trigeminal nerve dermatome).

Dermatomal pain can also precede the eruption. Subsequently, erythematous macules appear and progress to form clusters of papules and vesicles. These lesions then evolve into pustules, which quickly lyse and crust over. New blisters continue to appear over a period of 1–2 weeks—up to 6 weeks in some patients (see Figure 1).4,19 Necrotic skin lesions can be seen in immunocompromised or elderly patients. Lesions may resolve rapidly and completely or may lead to a chronic course and linger for years. As with chickenpox, once crusting occurs, the lesions cease to be infectious. Scarring with hypopigmentation or hyperpigmentation may persist over a long period.

Ocular Manifestations
Ocular manifestations affect about 50 % of patients with HZO and can be isolated. This proportion reaches 80 % in case of appearance of the Hutchinson Sign. This latter reflects the involvement the naso-ciliary branch and is characterized by eruption on the side and the tip of the nose.20–22

Cornea
Corneal complications are seen in up to 50 % of patients with HZO. Corneal involvement patterns are multiple and may reflect different mechanisms of the disease. Residual scarring occurs in 15 % of cases.19,23 Epithelial punctate or dendritic keratitis are the most frequently encountered lesions (50 %), followed in descending order by stromal keratitis (40 %), neurotrophic keratitis, and corneal mucus plaques (13 %).24

Punctate and pseudo-dendritic types of keratitis are mainly observed during the early eruptive phase. Punctate epithelial keratitis is usually peripheral and corresponds to swollen epithelial cells where VZV replicates. Pseudodendrites are the results of the coalescence of previous punctate epithelial keratitis. They are smaller and more superficially ulcerated than herpes simplex dendrites. Additionally, they typically do not show terminal bulbs.25–28 These keratitis should respond to antiviral therapy associated with lubricant eyedrops.

Subepithelial infiltrates may develop following the resolution of the epithelial keratitis, in the previously affected zones. Lesions may become chronic with a nummular pattern, corresponding to a probable immunologic stromal reaction to viral antigens.4,19 Topical corticosteroids associated with antiviral therapy are usually efficient.

Stromal and disciform keratitis, endothelitis and keratouveitis. These clinical pictures usually appear in the weeks or months following the eruptive stage. Descemet’s fold associated with stromal and epithelial edema may be diffused or localized with underlying keratic precipitates and anterior chamber inflammation. Concomitant trabeculitis may cause a major increase of the intraocular pressure that may become irreversible.29 VZV-related stromal keratitis are quite similar to those related to herpes simplex virus (HSV1) (see Figure 2) except that they show a higher tendency toward intense inflammation with major corneal neovascularization and subsequent lipidic keratopathy.23 All these manifestations may be the consequence of a variable immune reaction to residual viral production and should be treated with inflammation-adjusted corticosteroid therapy and antiviral drugs.1,19

Serpiginous keratitis is a rare but dreadful form of VZV-related corneal complication that presents as a peripheral ulcerative keratitis with infiltration and thinning, adjacent to a zone of limbal vasculitis. It may progress to neovascularization or perforation.19 Treatment is challenging and should be tailored to the risk for perforation. It incudes local or systemic corticosteroids, systemic antiviral therapy, autologous serum eyedrops, and conservative surgical procedures, such as amniotic membrane grafting.23

Corneal mucus plaques are another rare, but classic, HZO complication.30,31 This epithelial keratopathy occurs several months after the eruptive stage and is characterized by mucus plaques of variable size and location, migratory in nature. It is frequently associated with peripheral interstitial keratitis and/or chronic anterior uveitis.1,19 Pathogenesis is unclear: chronic epitheliopathy should be caused by either a low-grade viral replication, immune reactions, or neurotrophic mechanisms.32 Treatment should include lubricant eyedrops and antiviral therapy. Anti-inflammatory eyedrops should be used cautiously because of the risk for persistent epithelial defects.1,19,32

Neurotrophic keratopathy is a frequent complication of HZO. It resultsfrom the axonal loss in neurones where VZV replicates (see Figure 3). Corneal hypoesthesia is the landmark of neurotrophic keratopathy and appear on average 3 days after the onset of the rash.33 It is accompanied by perturbations of epithelial cicatrization, leading to corneal abnormality ranging from punctate superficial keratitis to persistent epithelial defects with vascularization and perforation.34 A stepwise treatment should be considered, beginning with eviction of all potential epithelial toxicity: antiviral and preservative-containing treatments should be withdrawn. Conversely, lubricant eyedrops are necessary to wash out all the inflammatory mediators located at the ocular surface. If the ulceration still progresses, instillation of autologous serum eye drops or amniotic membrane graft can be used to promote healing.35 Finally, corneal perforations may be treated with cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive if small, whereas larger perforations may require surgical correction with either multilayered inlay grafting of amniotic membrane or full thickness corneal patch graft.23,36–38

Conjunctiva, Episclera, Sclera
All types of conjunctival changes may be seen in HZO, ranging from simple papillary or follicular conjunctivitis to pseudomembrane formations with cicatrizing conjunctivis.19,23 Episcleritis and scleritis may occur soon after the eruptive stage. Scleritis is painful and usually diffuse anterior or nodular anterior in nature, but can become necrotizing.39,40 Scleral thinning and atrophy may result of chronic and/or severe scleritis.4,23,24

Uvea
Keratouveitis and endothelitis are the most common types of intraocular complications following HZO. Anterior chamber inflammation can be granulomatous or not, accompanied by keratic precipitates, posterior synechiae, and stromal edema. Secondary inflammatory hypertony and glaucoma may occur and may have several underlying mechanisms: 1) trabeculitis, 2) trabecular meshwork blockage by cellular debris, pigment, blood, 3) pupillary block from posterior synechiae, or 4) extensive peripheral anterior synechiae.4,19,41,42 Iritis arises from an ischemic occlusive vasculitis and typically results in sectorial iris atrophy (see Figure 4), a feature that is often useful for the retrospective diagnosis of a VZV- (or HSV) related episode of intraocular inflammation.12,43

VZV necrotizing retinitis is a rare but disastrous complication. It occurs either quickly after the eruptive stage or in a delayed fashion and can arise in patients without any cutaneous signs (zoster sine herpete).15 It is more frequent and severe in immunocompromised patients.

Eyelids
While eyelid swelling with ptosis is common during the acute eruptive stage, cicatricial changes caused by dermal retraction are more prone to cause ectropion, entropion, ectopic lashes leading to corneal irritation, and/or exposure keratopathy,19,23,24 which is more pejorative when corneal sensitivity is also impaired.1 Lagophthalmos may also results from associated facial nerve palsy. Numerous surgical techniques have been described to improve eyelid disorders and prevent corneal perforation.23

Neuro-ophthalmologic Manifestations

Oculomotor nerve palsies may occur after HZO. The third cranial nerve is the most commonly affected but other presentations including multiple and combined oculomotor nerve palsies can be seen.44,45

Optic neuritis can be isolated or be associated with necrotizing retinitis or other neurologic signs.19,46

Post-herpetic Neuralgia
Post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most common and one of the most dreadful complications of herpes zoster. It is defined as pain persisting beyond 1 month after rash onset or rash resolution.47,48 Pain is located in the dermatome affected by the rash. Symptoms range from allodynia (hypersensitivity to superficial stimuli) and spontaneous sensations of electric shock, stinging, itching, and burning to deep intermittent lancinating or sharp pain. PHN deeply affects the quality of life of patients affected and may cause suicide in elderly people.48 The risk for PHN increases with the age of the patient, the extension and the severity of the rash, the presence of early neuralgia, and the decline in corneal and cutaneous sensation.4,49–51 The prevalence of PHN decreases with time, from 30 % at 6 weeks to 9 % at 1 year of HZO rash.52 Pathogenesis of PHN is not completely elucidated, but it may result from chronic inflammation persisting in the trigeminal pathways after the acute infection has resolved. Some studies even demonstrated granulomatous arteritis and lymphocytic infiltration around the trigeminal tract and in the mesencephalic nucleus months and even years after the clinical manifestations of HZO.48,53 This chronic inflammation may be associated with a low-grade viral replication.53,54

Treatment of Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus
The main objectives of HZO treatment are lowering the viral replication, accelerating healing, limiting severity and duration of pain, and reducing the complications.

Antiviral Drugs—Mechanisms and Practical Use
Acyclovir (ACV) is the first antiviral drug that showed efficacy against VZV in randomized controlled clinical trials. It is a synthetic guanosine analog the activation of which requires three phosphorylations. Once activated, it becomes a potent inhibitor of the viral DNA polymerase, a key enzyme for VZV replication.47,55

The first phosphorylation is mainly achieved by the viral thymidine kinase (TK), expressed in productively infected cells, thus conferring its selectivity to ACV. Nevertheless, ACV may also be activated to a lesser extent by cellular kinases, inducing toxicity in rapidly renewing tissues such as corneal epithelium. However, this toxicity is much lower than that of first-generation, directly active, antiviral drugs. For treatment of HZO, 800 mg of oral ACV should be prescribed five times daily (4 g per day), allowing plasmatic concentrations of 6.9 to 0.96 μmol/l, which are active on the majority of VZV strains.56–59

According to clinical study versus placebo, 7–10 days of treatment with this dosage significantly reduces the risk for ocular complications, such as dendritic keratitis at the acute phase, and the delayed inflammatory eye diseases, such as stromal keratitis, uveitis, episcleritis, and scleritis.60–64

The treatment should be started as soon as the rash begins because any delay may increase the risk for ocular complications.62,65 Even if studies failed to demonstrate a benefit to treat patients for a longer period than 7 days, elderly patients, who are more prone to develop late complications, should benefit from a longer treatment.2

Valacyclovir (VACV) is a prodrug of ACV obtained by valine esterification, which has a three to five times greater oral bioavailability than oral ACV.66–68 Consequently, 1 g tid (3 g per day) of VACV is bio-equivalent to 800 mg five times a day (4 g per day) of ACV. A multicentric randomized controlled trial has shown the clinical equivalence of VACV (3 g per day) and ACV (4 g per day) in HZO. Furthermore, this therapeutic scheme improved patient compliance.69 Other studies indicate that VACV could be more efficient than ACV in preventing PHN for other locations of herpes zoster.47,70 Nevertheless, plasmatic concentrations obtained with 3 g per day of oral VACV do not surpass those obtained with 5 mg/k g/8 h of intravenous ACV.66 As a result, the oral maximal dose of VACV should not be used instead of the classic 10 mg/kg/8h intravenous ACV, which is required for severe ocular complications of VZV infection (such as necrotizing retinitis) and/or in immunocompromised patients.

Famciclovir is another antiviral drug that can be use to treat herpes zoster. It is a prodrug form of penciclovir with improved oral bioavailability. Like ACV, its phosphorylation requires a viral kinase.47 As with other antiviral drugs, treatment should be started as soon as possible and should last 7 days. Some randomized and controlled studies showed that 500 mg tid or even bid of famciclovir was noninferior to 4 g per day of oral aciclovir.71,72

Antalgic Treatments—Practical Use
Antiviral drugs and occasionally corticosteroids are the main treatments used to relieve the pain associated with the acute phase of herpes zoster. If pain is not controlled, antalgic treatments become necessary, ideally in collaboration with a physician specialized in pain control.47,73 Topical treatments, essentially based on lidocaine or capsaicin, can relieve superficial paresthesia (itching and burning sensations).47 Counterstimulation can be a helpful adjunct at this stage.

In cases of more severe pain, tricyclic antidepressants and antiepileptic drugs may be useful. The former are indicated in sharp or lancinating pain and are more effective if started promptly. The latter are mostly efficient on allodynia.47 Finally, opioids can be used orally or topically (block anesthesia), in resistant PHN or in case of uncontrollable pain in the acute phase.47

Corticosteroids—Practical Use
Topical corticosteroids are used to treat inflammatory components of delayed ocular complications such as stromal keratitis, uveitis, episcleritis, and scleritis (see above).

Systemic corticosteroids, such as oral prednisone or intravenous methylprednisolone, are indicated for the treatment of resistant acute phase pain,74,75 debilitating rash, facial palsy or cranial polyneuritis,47 and severe inflammatory ocular complications.1

Corticosteroids should be systematically used in association with an antiviral coverage to limit the risk for viral replication enhancement, even once the rash has resolved.

Varicella and Herpes Zoster Vaccination— Advantages and Limits
A live attenuated vaccine (OKA strain) for varicella was approved by the FDA and incorporated into the recommended immunization schedule for children in 1995. It was also approved in France in 2003. The vaccine has prevented disease in 80–85 % of patients receiving one dose with >95 % effectiveness at preventing severe varicella.76 In other terms, among people vaccinated, 3 % of children and 30 % of adults still can be affected by varicella, but with less severe forms.77,78 During the last 15 years, the vaccination program has shown a 80 % decreased in hospitalizations and global costs related to varicella compared with the 1990s.76

A vaccine against herpes zoster was approved by the FDA in 2006 for the prevention of immunocompetent individuals over 60 years of age. It also uses the OKA strain, but is 14 times more concentrated than the varicella vaccine. A randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, found that the vaccine reduced by 50 % the overall incidence of herpes zoster and the incidence of PHN by 66 %.79 As for chickenpox, vaccinated patients who developed herpes zoster had milder forms of the disease.

Paradoxically, models have projected that the incidence of zoster could rise over time as a result of childhood vaccination against varicella (due to the lack of boosting of immunity in adults through exposure to children with chickenpox),81–83 although empirical data to date have failed to document such an effect.84 Regardless, people vaccinated against varicella during their childhood should benefit, at least partially, from a protection against herpes zoster.

Conclusion
In summary, HZO can cause visual loss and debilitating PHN. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment reduce the rate and the severity of these complications. In difficult cases, a multidisciplinary approach including a neurologist or pain specialist can be necessary.

Herpes zoster and varicella vaccination will change the epidemiologic features of this frequent and ubiquitous infection.

Article Information:
Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Correspondence

Pr Marc Labetoulle, Service d’Ophtalmologie, CHU de Bicêtre, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Sud, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France E: marc.labetoulle@bct.aphp.fr

Received

2012-11-18T00:00:00

References

  1. Labetoulle M, Colin JZ, Zona Ophtalmique, Les Infections Oculaires, T Bourcier, B Bodaghi, A Bron (eds), Bulletin des sociétés ophtalmologiques de France, Paris, 2010;173–8.
  2. Liesegang TJ, Herpes zoster virus infection, Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2004;15(6):531–6.
  3. Ragozzino MW, Melton LJ, Kurland LT, et al., Populationbased study of herpes zoster and its sequelae, Medicine (Baltimore),1982;61(5):310–16.
  4. Liesegang TJ, Herpes zoster ophthalmicus natural history, risk factors, clinical presentation, and morbidity, Ophthalmology, 2008 Feb;115(Suppl. 2):S3–12.
  5. Niessen F, Embryofoetopahites virales, Oeil et virus, H Offret, Masson, Paris, 2000;189–204.
  6. W ang K, Lau TY, Morales M, et al., Laser-capture microdissection: refining estimates of the quantity and distribution of latent herpes simplex virus 1 and varicella-zoster virus DNA in human trigeminal Ganglia at the single-cell level, J Virol, 2005;79(22):14079–87.
  7. Richter ER, Dias JK, Gilbert JE, Atherton SS, Distribution of herpes simplex virus type 1 and varicella zoster virus in ganglia of the human head and neck, J Infect Dis, 2009;200(12):1901–6.
  8. Hope-Simpson RE, The nature of herpes zoter: a long-term study on new hypothesis, Proc R Soc Med, 1965;58:9–20.
  9. Arvin A, Aging, immunity, and the varicella-zoster virus, N Engl J Med, 2005;352(22):2266–7. 10. Lewis GW, Zoster sine herpete, Br Med J, 1958;2(5093):418–21.
  10. Silverstein BE, Chandler D, Neger R, Margolis TP, Disciform keratitis: a case of herpes zoster sine herpete, Am J Ophthalmol, 1997;123(2):254–5.
  11. V an der Lelij A, Ooijman FM, Kijlstra A, Rothova A, Anterior uveitis with sectoral iris atrophy in the absence of keratitis: a distinct clinical entity among herpetic eye diseases, Ophthalmology, 2000;107(6):1164–70.
  12. de Monchy I, Doan S, Offret H, Complications oculaires de la varicelle, L’herpès et le zona oculaire en pratique: clinique, thérapeutique et prévention, M Labetoulle, Med’Com, Paris, 2009;213–30.
  13. Ducos de Lahitte G, Bodaghi B, Uvéites antérieures à HSV et VZV, L’herpès et le zona oculaire en pratique: clinique, thérapeutique et prévention, M Labetoulle, Med’Com, Paris, 2009;159–72.
  14. Ducos de Lahitte G, Bodaghi B, Rétinites herpétiques à HSV et VZV, nécrosantes et non-nécrosantes, L’herpès et le zona oculaire en pratique: clinique, thérapeutique et prévention, M Labetoulle, Med’Com, Paris, 2009;173–92
  15. Donahue JG, Choo PW, Manson JE, Platt R, The incidence of herpes zoster, Arch Intern Med, 1995 Aug 7;155(15):1605–9.
  16. Chapman RS, Cross KW, Fleming DM, The incidence of shingles and its implications for vaccination policy, Vaccine, 2003;21(19–20):2541–7.
  17. Buchbinder SP, Katz MH, Hessol NA, et al., Herpes zoster and human immunodeficiency virus infection, J Infect Dis, 1992;166(5):1153–6.
  18. Abitbol O, Hoang-Xuan T, Zona ophtalmique, L’herpès et le zona oculaire en pratique: clinique, thérapeutique et prévention, M Labetoulle, Med’Com, Paris, 2009;193–212.
  19. Harding SP, Management of ophthalmic zoster, J Med Virol, 1993;Suppl. 1:97–101.
  20. Yamada K, Hayasaka S, Yamamoto Y, Setogawa T, Cutaneous eruption with or without ocular complications in patients with herpes zoster involving the trigeminal nerve, Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 1990;228(1):1–4.
  21. Zaal MJW, Völker-Dieben HJ, D’Amaro J, Prognostic value of Hutchinson’s sign in acute herpes zoster ophthalmicus, Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2003;241(3):187–91.
  22. Kaufman SC, Anterior segment complications of herpes zoster ophthalmicus, Ophthalmology, 2008;115(Suppl. 2):S24–32.
  23. Liesegang TJ, Corneal complications from herpes zoster ophthalmicus, Ophthalmology, 1985;92(3):316–24.
  24. Colin J, Pathologies de la cornée et de la conjonctive, Atteintes herpétiques. Zona ophtalmique, Oeil et virus, H Offret, Masson, Paris, 2000:219–40.
  25. Kim JH, Ko MK, Shin JC, Infectivity of basal epithelial cells in herpetic dendritic epithelial keratitis, Korean J Ophthalmol, 1997;11(2):84–8.
  26. Colin J, Labetoulle M, Kératites herpétiques, conjonctivites et blépharites: formes cliniques, L’herpès et le zona oculaire en pratique: clinique, thérapeutique et prévention, M Labetoulle, Med’Com, Paris, 2009;79–96.
  27. Starr CE, Pavan-Langston D. Varicella-zoster virus: mechanisms of pathogenicity and corneal disease, Ophthalmol Clin North Am, 2002;15(1):7–15, v.
  28. Reijo A, Antti V, Jukka M, Endothelial cell loss in herpes zoster keratouveitis, Br J Ophthalmol, 1983;67(11):751–4.
  29. Marsh RJ, Herpes zoster keratitis, Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K, 1973;93(0):181–92.
  30. Piebenga LW, Laibson PR, Dendritic lesions in herpes zoster ophthalmicus, Arch Ophthalmol, 1973;90(4):268–70.
  31. Kaufman HE, Treatment of viral diseases of the cornea and external eye, Prog Retin Eye Res, 2000;19(1):69–85.
  32. Cobo M, Foulks GN, Liesegang T, et al., Observations on the natural history of herpes zoster ophthalmicus, Curr Eye Res, 1987;6(1):195–9.
  33. Mackie IA, Role of the corneal nerves in destructive disease of the cornea, Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K, 1978;98(3):343–7.
  34. Bourcier T, Semoun O, Kératites métaherpétiques, L’herpès et le zona oculaire en pratique: clinique, thérapeutique et prévention, Med’Com, 2009;125–34.
  35. Duchesne B, Tahi H, Galand A, Use of human fibrin glue and amniotic membrane transplant in corneal perforation, Cornea, 2001;20(2):230–32.
  36. Hanada K, Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, Tsubota K, Multilayered amniotic membrane transplantation for severe ulceration of the cornea and sclera, Am J Ophthalmol, 2001;131(3):324–31.
  37. Kaufman HE, Insler MS, Ibrahim-Elzembely HA, Kaufman SC, Human fibrin tissue adhesive for sutureless lamellar keratoplasty and scleral patch adhesion: a pilot study, Ophthalmology, 2003;110(11):2168–72.
  38. Gonzalez-Gonzalez LA, Molina-Prat N, Doctor P, et al., Clinical features and presentation of infectious scleritis from herpes viruses: a report of 35 cases, Ophthalmology, 2012;119(7):1460–64.
  39. Rousseau A, Gabison E, Sclérites infectieuses, Les Infections Oculaires, T Bourcier, B Bodaghi, A Bron, Bulletin des sociétés ophtalmologiques de France, Paris, 2010:212–19.
  40. Pogorzalek N, de Monchy I, Gendron G, Labetoulle M, [Hypertony and uveitis: 103 cases of uveitis], J Fr Ophtalmol, 2011;34(3):157–63.
  41. Thean JH, Hall AJ, Stawell RJ, Uveitis in Herpes zoster ophthalmicus, Clin Experiment Ophthalmol, 2001;29(6):406–10.
  42. Womack LW, Liesegang TJ, Complications of herpes zoster ophthalmicus, Arch Ophthalmol, 1983;101(1):42–5.
  43. Marsh RJ, Dulley B, Kelly V, External ocular motor palsies in ophthalmic zoster: a review, Br J Ophthalmol, 1977;61(11):677–82.
  44. Kattah JC, Kennerdell JS, Orbital apex syndrome secondary to herpes zoster ophthalmicus, Am J Ophthalmol, 1978;85(3):378–82.
  45. Labetoulle M, Syndrome de nécrose rétinienne aigüe, Oeil et virus, H Offret. Masson, Paris, 2000;307–21.
  46. Pavan-Langston D, Herpes zoster antivirals and pain management, Ophthalmology, 2008;115(Suppl. 2):S13–20.
  47. Hess TM, Lutz LJ, Nauss LA, Lamer TJ, Treatment of acute herpetic neuralgia, A case report and review of the literature, Minn Med, 1990;73(4):37–40.
  48. Zaal MJ, Völker-Dieben HJ, D’Amaro J, Risk and prognostic factors of postherpetic neuralgia and focal sensory denervation: a prospective evaluation in acute herpes zoster ophthalmicus, Clin J Pain, 2000;16(4):345–51.
  49. Dworkin RH, Boon RJ, Griffin DR, Phung D, Postherpetic neuralgia: impact of famciclovir, age, rash severity, and acute pain in herpes zoster patients, J Infect Dis, 1998;178 Suppl. 1:S76–80.
  50. Nagasako EM, Johnson RW, Griffin DRJ, Dworkin RH, Rash severity in herpes zoster: correlates and relationship to postherpetic neuralgia, J Am Acad Dermatol, 2002;46(6):834–9.
  51. Scott FT, Leedham-Green ME, Barrett-Muir WY, et al., A study of shingles and the development of postherpetic neuralgia in East London, J Med Virol, 2003;70 Suppl. 1:S24–30.
  52. Gilden DH, Cohrs RJ, Mahalingam R, VZV vasculopathy and postherpetic neuralgia: progress and perspective on antiviral therapy, Neurology, 2005;64(1):21–5.
  53. Gilden DH, Cohrs RJ, Hayward AR, et al., Chronic varicella-zoster virus ganglionitis—a possible cause of postherpetic neuralgia, J Neurovirol, 2003;9(3):404–7.
  54. Deback C, Agut H, Alphaherpesvirinae II: virus varicelle-zona et mode d’action des anti-viraux, L’herpès et le zona oculaire en pratique: clinique, thérapeutique et prévention, M Labetoulle, Med’Com, Paris, 2009;31–50.
  55. Harding SP, Rigal D, Sharma MS, et al., Superior intraocular penetration of aciclovir aftre valaciclovir in comparison with oral aciclovir. ICAAC congress poster 24–27 September 1998, San Diego, USA.
  56. McKendrick MW, McGill JI, White JE, Wood MJ, Oral acyclovir in acute herpes zoster, Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 1986;13;293(6561):1529–32.
  57. McKendrick MW, Care C, Burke C, et al., Oral acyclovir in herpes zoster, J Antimicrob Chemother, 1984;14(6):661–5.
  58. Collum LM, Akhtar J, McGettrick P, Oral acyclovir in herpetic keratitis, Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K, 1985;104(Pt 6):629–32.
  59. Cobo LM, Foulks GN, Liesegang T, et al., Oral acyclovir in the treatment of acute herpes zoster ophthalmicus, Ophthalmology, 1986;93(6):763–70.
  60. Cobo LM, Foulks GN, Liesegang T, et al., Oral acyclovir in the therapy of acute herpes zoster ophthalmicus. An interim report, Ophthalmology, 1985;92(11):1574–83.
  61. Borruat FX, Buechi ER, Piguet B, et al., [Prevention of ocular complications of herpes zoster ophthalmicus by adequate treatment with acyclovir], Klin Monbl Augenheilkd, 1991;198(5):358–60.
  62. Hoang-Xuan T, Büchi ER, Herbort CP, et al. Oral acyclovir for herpes zoster ophthalmicus, Ophthalmology, 1992;July;99(7):1062–70; discussion 1070–71.
  63. Harding SP, Porter SM, Oral acyclovir in herpes zoster ophthalmicus, Curr Eye Res, 1991;Suppl. 10:177–82.
  64. Severson EA, Baratz KH, Hodge DO, Burke JP, Herpes zoster ophthalmicus in olmsted county, Minnesota: have systemic antivirals made a difference?, Arch Ophthalmol, 2003;121(3):386–90.
  65. Ormrod D, Goa K, Valaciclovir: a review of its use in the management of herpes zoster, Drugs, 2000;59(6):1317–40.
  66. Soul-Lawton J, Seaber E, On N, et al., Absolute bioavailability and metabolic disposition of valaciclovir, the L-valyl ester of acyclovir, following oral administration to humans, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1995;39(12):2759–64.
  67. Beutner KR, Valacyclovir: a review of its antiviral activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and clinical efficacy, Antiviral Res, 1995;28(4):281–90.
  68. Colin J, Prisant O, Cochener B, et al., Comparison of the efficacy and safety of valaciclovir and acyclovir for the treatment of herpes zoster ophthalmicus, Ophthalmology, 2000;107(8):1507–11.
  69. Beutner KR, Friedman DJ, Forszpaniak C, et al., Valaciclovir compared with acyclovir for improved therapy for herpes zoster in immunocompetent adults, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1995;39(7):1546–53.
  70. Shafran SD, Tyring SK, Ashton R, et al., Once, twice, or three times daily famciclovir compared with aciclovir for the oral treatment of herpes zoster in immunocompetent adults: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind clinical trial, J Clin Virol, 2004;29(4):248–53.
  71. Tyring S, Engst R, Corriveau C, et al., Famciclovir for ophthalmic zoster: a randomised aciclovir controlled study, Br J Ophthalmol, 2001;85(5):576–81.
  72. Nikkels AF, Piérard GE, Oral antivirals revisited in the treatment of herpes zoster: what do they accomplish?, Am J Clin Dermatol, 2002;3(9):591–8.
  73. Whitley RJ, Weiss H, Gnann JW Jr, et al., Acyclovir with and without prednisone for the treatment of herpes zoster. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Collaborative Antiviral Study Group, Ann Intern Med, 1996;125(5):376–83.
  74. Wood MJ, Johnson RW, McKendrick MW, et al., A randomized trial of acyclovir for 7 days or 21 days with and without prednisolone for treatment of acute herpes zoster, N Engl J Med, 1994;330(13):896–900.
  75. Lee W, Barry, Liesegang TJ, Herpes Zoster Keratitis, Cornea (third edition), JH Krachmer, MJ Mannis, EJ Holland, Mosby Elsevier, 2011;985–1000.
  76. Vázquez M, Shapiro ED, Varicella vaccine and infection with varicella-zoster virus, N Engl J Med, 2005;352(5):439–40.
  77. Vázquez M, LaRussa PS, Gershon AA, et al., Effectiveness over time of varicella vaccine, JAMA, 2004;291(7):851–5.
  78. Oxman MN, Levin MJ, Johnson GR, et al., A vaccine to prevent herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in older adults., N Engl J Med, 2005;352(22):2271–84.
  79. Gelb LD, Preventing herpes zoster through vaccination, Ophthalmology, 2008;115(2 Suppl.):S35–8.
  80. Solomon BA, Kaporis AG, Glass AT, et al., Lasting immunity to varicella in doctors study (L.I.V.I.D. study), J Am Acad Dermatol, 1998;38(5 Pt 1):763–5.
  81. Goldman GS, Cost-benefit analysis of universal varicella vaccination in the U.S. taking into account the closely related herpes-zoster epidemiology, Vaccine, 2005;23(25):3349–55.
  82. Brisson M, Edmunds WJ, Gay NJ, Varicella vaccination: impact of vaccine efficacy on the epidemiology of VZV, J Med Virol, 2003;70 Suppl. 1:S31–37.
  83. Kwong JC, Tanuseputro P, Zagorski B, et al., Impact of varicella vaccination on health care outcomes in Ontario, Canada: effect of a publicly funded program?, Vaccine, 2008;26(47):6006–12.

Further Resources

Share this Article
Related Content In Retina/Vitreous
  • Copied to clipboard!
    accredited arrow-downarrow_leftarrow-right-bluearrow-right-dark-bluearrow-right-greyarrow-right-orangearrow-right-whitearrow-right-blueavatarcalendarchevron-down crosscrossdownloademailexclaimationfeedbackfiltergraph-arrowinterviewslinkmenumore_dots padlock person play_buttonplay-colour-tmcplay-colourAsset 1podcastprinter scenerysearch share social_facebooksocial_googleplussocial_instagramsocial_linkedin_altsocial_linkedin_altsocial_pinterestlogo-twitter-glyph-32social_youtubeshape-star (1)tick-bluetick-orangetick-whiteticktimetranscriptup-arrowwebinar