Home > News > Retinal Progenitor Cells in Regeneration and Repair Highlight New Therapeutic Targets
Retina/Vitreous
Read Time: 8 mins

Retinal Progenitor Cells in Regeneration and Repair Highlight New Therapeutic Targets

Published Online: March 2nd 2011 European Ophthalmic Review, 2009,3(1):75-80 DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/EOR.2009.03.01.75
Authors: Andrew D Dick, Debra A Carter, Balini Balasubramaniam, Eric J Mayer
Quick Links:
Abstract
Article
Article Information
Abstract:
Overview

The quest to understand the ability of the retina to not only sustain its function throughout life but also, as a result of pathological egeneration, to promote repair via stimulating endogenous regenerative capacity or via cell replacement is nearing clinical assessment. However, we still need to understand the kinetics and dynamics of cell replacement in healthy or ageing retina. This would lead to the possibility of manipulating endogenous ocular progenitor cells towards facilitating cell replacement when degeneration has ensued. Arguably, the most clinically immediate benefits will arise from cell-based therapies. However, the questions of which cells to use to maximise clinical outcome – including ocular sources or manipulation of non-ocular cell sources, including embryonic stem cells, as neuralised progenitor cell sources – and how best to deliver therapy remains unqualified. Ultimate success will depend on integration into damaged host tissue, prevention of gliosis and knowing which cells to target to replace.

Keywords

Prognitor cells, retina, stem cells

Article:

Retinal Repair and Regeneration
Throughout life, tissues and organs constantly repair and replace cells to maintain optimal function. The central nervous system (CNS) – the brain, retina and spinal cord – was conventionally thought, because of poor response to damage, to have only limited ability to repair; however, even without damage how can a set of neuronal cells last a lifetime? It is clear that when a tissue is structurally damaged (see Figure 1) there is progressive loss of function over time and recovery is far more limited. This happens following trauma (surgical or accidental) or with certain diseases that mechanistically have in common direct cell death, ischaemia and inflammation (diabetes, stroke, autoinflammatory disease and degenerative conditions).

Any recovery of function after successful control of ischaemia, inflammation or cell death may occur via cell replacement. However, to this end there remains controversy over whether neuronal progenitor cells (cells able to divide and generate new cells of neuronal lineage) reside within adult retina.1,2 Pertinently, this debate raises the possibility of neuronal replacement in man, as observed in experimental mammals,3–5 even though single cell cultures confirm that intra-retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) are uncommon.6 One should therefore question whether the presence of retinal neural progenitor cells or recent progenitor immigrants into the retina explains the functional recovery observed after cell loss without extensive destruction of extracellular tissue architecture from macular light toxicity7 or after macula-off retinal detachment.8–10

Adult Tissue Progenitor Cells and Their Detection
To maintain tissue and cellular homeostasis and function, cellular replacement is likely to be ongoing, inconspicuous and, possibly, stochastic. It is unlikely to occur more quickly in adults than during development. Retinal cell replacement occurs within myeloid cell populations (where perivascular macrophages and microglia are replaced over six months),11 and is likely to be much quicker than neural cell replacement. Establishing their connections and explaining recovery, if present, is a slow process. So, what is the rate of cell replacement in normal retina? While it is possible to see cells dying in the retina,11 the rate of cell loss in the normal retina is difficult to establish as there is no analogous method for seeing new cells added in the steady state, unless they are directly labelled and transferred.12 Replacement from in situ mitosis is uncommon as few cells divide in the normal mammalian retina,12 although dividing cells increase in stressed tissue such as Chx10-null mutants.13

RPCs are a majority cell type during development and are easy to isolate and study. Progenitor cells from either developing or adult tissues will potentially be dividing and differentiating (in various stages and pathways of differentiation), and many markers are used to positively or negatively select cell populations of interest (see Table 1 14–18 ). To date, this has been best achieved using cell-surface flow cytometric phenotypic analysis and isolation via flow cytometric cell sorting or, more commonly, magnetic bead cell sorting. Another cell-sorting approach utilises progenitor cell or tissue-specific gene promoters to drive fluorescent expression (green fluorescent protein [GFP]).19 Other intracellular markers that may be used in this way include: brain and acute leukaemia cytoplasmic (BAALC), a neuroectodermal marker found in the CNS and haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in the retina; cytoskeletal proteins such as intermediate filaments (nestin and double cortin); and markers of cell division (cyclin D1). The extent of expression and/or promoter activity may vary according to the stage of the cell cycle, and for RPCs there is significant variation in the genes used to exit from the cell cycle and during different stages of cell development.20 The overlap of expression of cell-surface phenotypic markers and nuclear transcription factors or forkhead gene expression between different populations of stem/progenitor cells emphasises common features in this heterogenous group of cells, with potential to understand the cellular pathways involved (see Figure 2).

Origin and Lineage of Adult Human Retinal Progenitor Cells
There is no definitive direct comparison between progenitor cells in developing and adult retina. It is probable that adult retinal progenitors follow the same differentiation sequence as those in developing retina. Retinal progenitors may arise from recruited bone marrow progenitor cell populations (mesenchymal or haematopoietic), from resident tissue progenitors (of unspecified, glial or endothelial lineage) stimulated by damage or disease (creating a need for new cells) or from transdifferentiation of one of the known retinal cell types (as discussed below), particularly as in mammals retinal damage stimulates repair and is associated with cell division.21 Following retinal ischaemia there is a massive increase in cell proliferation, but only if the ischaemia is followed by reperfusion.22 This indicates the need to stimulate the regenerative process and the possible recruitment of dividing cells from the circulation. Regardless of lineage or degree of differentiation, progenitor cells must respond to environmental cues in tissue to generate the right cell type. For example, the fate of dividing retinal cells in culture is affected by differentiated retinal cell types,23 and the integration of transplanted progenitor cells depends on the host tissue’s need for them.24

In general, although not exclusively, cells with stem or progenitor properties show evidence of pre-programming or regional specification.25 The lineage or origin of retinal progenitors therefore remains an open question, with iris pigment epithelial cell,26 retinal pigment epithelial cell27 or circulating progenitor cell lineages all possible, in addition to resident tissue populations. Alternatively, retinal progenitors may arise from a glial lineage, as O2A progenitor cells (O4+ and platelet-derived growth factor [PDGF]-αR+) may develop into cells of astrocytic or oligodendrocytic lineage, which are present in the retina.28 These cells are also A2B5+ (see Table 2) and behave differently from similar cell phenotypes in the CNS.29

It is generally felt that in the adult eye RPCs reside within the ciliary body30 or its epithelium, and to reach the retina they would need to migrate posteriorly. If this is the case, there should be a system to support their migration, such as the network of nestin-positive cells within the adult retina.31 Primate ciliary body epithelium contains cellular and nuclear features compatible with dividing RPCs,32 and in humans occasional cells of the inner non-pigmented epithelium of the pars plana are nestin-positive (see Figure 3). This niche of progenitor cells is supported by the increased rate at which nestin-positive cells are generated from anterior adult human retina (see Figure 4).1

Progenitor Cells and Retinal Degeneration
Our understanding of retinal degeneration is that cells die progressively in life and faster in disease, eventually leading to functional loss. In this context, neuroprotection involves the prevention of apoptosis. If we accept that some cellular replacement occurs, degeneration becomes a product of the relative rate of cell loss and the rate of (and potential for) cellular replacement; if deficits in cell replacement occur, the functional result is cellular degeneration. In the normal adult retina the few proliferating cells observed (of neural, glial or vascular lineage) are principally non-myeloid, as the majority of retinal microglia/macrophages that are replaced do not proliferate in situ.12 However, in transplant chimaeras, marrow-derived cells home to damaged areas in the eye and regenerate retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)15 as well as retinal vessels.17

In animal models of inherited retinal degeneration, retinal degeneration is usually the result of apoptosis due to a gene deficit.33,34 Are replacement cells more vulnerable to apoptosis because their connections are less well established within a tissue? This would certainly explain the sudden functional loss that is manifest in some degenerative diseases. Treatments that protect cells from apoptosis are as likely to work on older cells as on those that have been more recently laid down. Mouse or human bone-marrow-derived stem cells injected into mouse eyes undergoing retinal degeneration attenuate retinal photoreceptor degeneration and loss of vasculature and alter electroretinograms, although they lead to a predominance of cone instead of rod photoreceptors.35 Cell transplants have multiple potential effects. In animal models, rescue of degeneration occurs by cell, matrix or growth factors, suggesting that degeneration occurs because of defects in any of these elements. Indirect evidence for this comes from RCS rats, where a defective gene (Mertk) expressed in the RPE for phagocytic function causes photoreceptor degeneration to occur. Degeneration can be delayed by retinal haemorrhage, trauma or the injection of growth factors, e.g. basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF or FGF-2).36 The same is also true of light-induced retinal damage.37,38 Other growth factors are also able to rescue retinal degeneration.39–48 The growth factors that rescue degenerating cells also potentially influence progenitor cell fate (see Table 2 1,5,49–63).

Cell-based Therapy
When transplanting dissociated cells, for example transplanting immature retinal cells into the retina to replace damaged photoreceptors, the cellular complement of the diseased tissues is increased to a level compatible with regaining function. In the retina, this was initially demonstrated by del Cerro in 1989,64 who transplanted zero- to two-day-old rat retinal cell suspensions into recipient animals with light-induced retinal degeneration, demonstrating survival and anatomical integration of these transplants. Survival of cells transplanted into the subretinal space is now accepted.65 More recently, electrophysiological and behavioural evidence has been presented of functional integration of these transplants in mice with inherited retinal degeneration;66 therefore, cellular transplantation in the retina is clearly possible. It is a question of identifying the correct cell to transplant in sufficient numbers to justify the surgical trauma involved. To be effective we need to better understand the nature and behaviour of intrinsic cells and find cells that integrate safely and in sufficient numbers and generate the appropriate lineage. Cells will integrate into a tissue if the right cell is generated in an environment where there is a need, such that the tissue can accept the integrating cells.25,67 Transplantation requires an understanding of cell biology, the isolation of cells able to integrate into the retina and the extra- and intra-cellular signalling that guides these events. There is a need to study single cells (from developing tissue); where this has been possible, gene expression is heterogenous20 due to the cells studied being at different stages of the cell cycle, as well as RPCs using different genes to exit the cell cycle.20 This suggests that cell fate and lineage decisions are made early in cellular differentiation – before cells have ceased dividing – as by definition all RPCs in this study were identified as expressing cyclin D1.20 Importantly, RPCs are not a single cell type but rather a variety of cells at various stages along several as yet incompletely characterised differentiation pathways. Comparing the transcriptional profiles of retinal progenitors between adult and developing tissue will establish whether adult progenitors mirror those in development. For example, transcriptomics will predict and focus therapies.

Do Cellular Interactions Influence Progenitor Cell Fate?
Functions such as vision are testimony to the interaction of cells. Of critical importance in this respect is the interaction of RPCs with microglia. RPCs are key to the retina’s potential for cellular replacement, and microglial cells are central to regulating the response of tissues to various diseases. Microglia express CD200R and other inhibitory receptors that control activation status, with its ligand expressed on the retinal neurone CD200.68,69 Despite this cognate receptor control, signals (such as interferon-gamma) will promote classic macrophage activation of microglial cells, with subsequent release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, growth factors and proteases and increased cell migration (see Figure 5). IL-6 directly inhibits neurosphere formation in vitro and thus has potential for progenitor cell division, migration, differentiation and, ultimately, functional integration.

Towards Therapy – The Caveats
In the study of tissue repair and regeneration, cell lines offer some advantages, with cells being available in large numbers, cells having reproducible properties and reduced numbers of unwanted cell types compared with primary cell cultures. However, with respect to therapy, the accumulation of karyotypic abnormalities and certain mutations70 in embryonic stem cells cultured in vitro after more than 20 passages71 is of concern and correlates with a loss of toti-potency,71 which needs to be refined before therapy can be considered. Similar concerns arise for tissue-specific cell lines (e.g. Müller cells),72 where cells become near-triploid.73 Transplanted primary cells and in situ progenitor populations are important new therapeutic targets for optimising repair and regeneration in the retina, for example via gene therapy. In this respect it is encouraging that human embyonic stem cells reliably generate RPCs,74 making them useful for screening primary cell interventions. Although primary cells from post mortem retina are subject to variations in tissue2 and adult human cells in culture show slow growth1,2 compared with immature retinal cells50 and animal cells,4,5 adult human retinal progenitors are a target for human therapy and a possible source of the retina’s inherent regenerative potential.

The treatment of diseases with destruction of tissue architecture (see Figure 1) represents a special challenge as cellular replacement may require accompanying tissue synthesiser technology if it is to lead to functional recovery. The understanding of retinal cell biology in health and disease from all of these areas of research combined with advances in gene therapy offers a future with realistic hope of treating what is currently considered to be untreatable blindness.

Article Information:
Disclosure

The authors’ research is supported by the National Eye Research Centre, the Guide Dogs for the Blind and the McAlpine Foundation. Balini Balasubramaniam is supported by the Dr Hans and Mrs Gertrude Hirsch Scholarship. Eric J Mayer is supported by a National Career Scientist Award from the Department of Health and NHS R&D. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Correspondence

Eric J Mayer or Andrew D Dick, Bristol Eye Hospital, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LX, UK. E: e.mayer@bristol.ac.uk or a.dick@bristol.ac.uk

Support

We thank Mr EH Hughes for generating Figure 1 images.

Received

2009-03-13T00:00:00

References

  1. Mayer EJ, Carter DA, Ren Y, et al., Neural progenitor cells from post-mortem adult human retina, Br J Ophthalmol, 2005;89:102–6.
  2. Carter DA, Mayer EJ, Dick AD, The effect of post-mortem time, donor age and sex on the generation of neurospheres from adult human retina, Br J Ophthalmol, 2007;91:1216–18.
  3. Turner DL, Cepko CL, A common progenitor for neurons and glia persists in rat retina late in development, Nature, 1987;328:131–6.
  4. Tropepe V, Coles BL, Chiasson BJ, et al., Retinal stem cells in the adult mammalian eye, Science, 2000;287:2032–6.
  5. Ahmad I, Dooley CM, Thoreson WB, et al., In vitro analysis of a mammalian retinal progenitor that gives rise to neurons and glia, Brain Res, 1999;831:1–10.
  6. Coles BL, Angenieux B, Inoue T, et al., Facile isolation and the characterization of human retinal stem cells, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2004;101:15772–7.
  7. Knox Cartwright NE, Tole DM, Haynes RJ, et al., Recovery from macular phototoxicity after corneal triple procedure, Cornea, 2007;26:102–4.
  8. Gundry MF, Davies EW, Recovery of visual acuity after retinal detachment surgery, Am J Ophthalmol, 1974;77:310–14.
  9. Kusaka S, Toshino A, Ohashi Y, Sakaue E, Long-term visual recovery after scleral buckling for macula-off retinal detachments, Jpn J Ophthalmol, 1998;42:218–22.
  10. Kreissig I, Prognosis of return of macular function after retinal reattachment, Mod Probl Ophthalmol, 1977;18:415–29.
  11. Cordeiro MF, Guo L, Luong V, et al., Real-time imaging of single nerve cell apoptosis in retinal neurodegeneration, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2004;101:13352–6.
  12. Xu H, Chen M, Mayer EJ, et al., Turnover of resident retinal microglia in the normal adult mouse, Glia, 2007;55: 1189–98.
  13. Dhomen NS, Balaggan KS, Pearson RA, et al., Absence of chx10 causes neural progenitors to persist in the adult retina, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006;47:386–96.
  14. Bhattacharya S, Das A, Mallya K, Ahmad I, Maintenance of retinal stem cells by Abcg2 is regulated by notch signaling, J Cell Sci, 2007;120:2652–62.
  15. Harris JR, Brown GA, Jorgensen M, et al., Bone marrowderived cells home to and regenerate retinal pigment epithelium after injury, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006;47: 2108–13.
  16. Mitton KP, Swain PK, Khanna H, et al., Interaction of retinal bZIP transcription factor NRL with Flt3-interacting zincfinger protein Fiz1: possible role of Fiz1 as a transcriptional repressor, Hum Mol Genet, 2003;12:365–73.
  17. Grant MB, May WS, Caballero S, et al., Adult hematopoietic stem cells provide functional hemangioblast activity during retinal neovascularization, Nat Med, 2002;8:607–12.
  18. Li Y, Atmaca-Sonmez P, Schanie CL, et al., Endogenous bone marrow derived cells express retinal pigment epithelium cell markers and migrate to focal areas of RPE damage, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2007;48:4321–7.
  19. Humphrey RK, Bucay N, Beattie GM, et al., Characterization and isolation of promoter-defined nestinpositive cells from the human fetal pancreas, Diabetes, 2003;52:2519–25.
  20. Trimarchi JM, Stadler MB, Cepko CL, Individual retinal progenitor cells display extensive heterogeneity of gene expression, PLoS ONE, 2008;3:e1588.
  21. Ishikawa Y, Uga S, Ikui H, Letter: The cell division of the pigment epithelium in the repairing retina after photocoagulation, J Electron Microsc (Tokyo), 1973;22:273–5.
  22. Stefansson E, Wilson CA, Schoen T, Kuwabara T, Experimental ischemia induces cell mitosis in the adult rat retina, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1988;29:1050–55.
  23. Waid DK, McLoon SC, Ganglion cells influence the fate of dividing retinal cells in culture, Development, 1998;125: 1059–66.
  24. Lu B, Kwan T, Kurimoto Y, et al., Transplantation of EGFresponsive neurospheres from GFP transgenic mice into the eyes of rd mice, Brain Res, 2002;943:292–300.
  25. Fricker RA, Carpenter MK, Winkler C, et al., Site-specific migration and neuronal differentiation of human neural progenitor cells after transplantation in the adult rat brain, J Neurosci, 1999;19:5990–6005.
  26. Sun G, Asami M, Ohta H, et al., Retinal stem/progenitor properties of iris pigment epithelial cells, Dev Biol, 2006;289:243–52.
  27. Engelhardt M, Bogdahn U, Aigner L, Adult retinal pigment epithelium cells express neural progenitor properties and the neuronal precursor protein doublecortin, Brain Res, 2005;1040:98–111.
  28. Raff MC, Miller RH, Noble M, A glial progenitor cell that develops in vitro into an astrocyte or an oligodendrocyte depending on culture medium, Nature, 1983;303:390–96.
  29. Noble M, Arhin A, Gass D, Mayer-Proschel M, The cortical ancestry of oligodendrocytes: common principles and novel features, Dev Neurosci, 2003;25:217–33.
  30. Ahmad I, Tang L, Pham H, Identification of neural progenitors in the adult mammalian eye, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2000;270:517–21.
  31. Mayer EJ, Hughes EH, Carter DA, Dick AD, Nestin positive cells in adult human retina and in epiretinal membranes, Br J Ophthalmol, 2003;87:1154–8.
  32. Jonas JB, Panda-Jonas S, Singh Hayreh S, Retinal progenitor cells in the posterior pars plana of rhesus monkeys, Br J Ophthalmol, 2004;88:836–7.
  33. Hughes EH, Schlichtenbrede FC, Murphy CC, et al., Minocycline delays photoreceptor death in the rds mouse through a microglia-independent mechanism, Exp Eye Res, 2004;78:1077–84.
  34. Hughes EH, Schlichtenbrede FC, Murphy CC, et al., Generation of activated sialoadhesin-positive microglia during retinal degeneration, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2003;44:2229–34.
  35. Otani A, Dorrell MI, Kinder K, et al., Rescue of retinal degeneration by intravitreally injected adult bone marrowderived lineage-negative hematopoietic stem cells, J Clin Invest, 2004;114:765–74.
  36. Faktorovich EG, Steinberg RH, Yasumura D, et al., Photoreceptor degeneration in inherited retinal dystrophy delayed by basic fibroblast growth factor, Nature, 1990;347:83–6.
  37. Faktorovich EG, Steinberg RH, Yasumura D, et al., Basic fibroblast growth factor and local injury protect photoreceptors from light damage in the rat, J Neurosci, 1992;12:3554–67.
  38. Smith SB, Titelman R, Hamasaki DI, Effects of basic fibroblast growth factor on the retinal degeneration of the mi(vit)/mi(vit) (vitiligo) mouse: a morphologic and electrophysiologic study, Exp Eye Res, 1996;63:565–77.
  39. Straten G, Schmeer C, Kretz A, et al., Potential synergistic protection of retinal ganglion cells from axotomy-induced apoptosis by adenoviral administration of glial cell linederived neurotrophic factor and X-chromosome-linked inhibitor of apoptosis, Neurobiol Dis, 2002;11:123–33.
  40. LaVail MM, Unoki K, Yasumura D, et al., Multiple growth factors, cytokines, and neurotrophins rescue photoreceptors from the damaging effects of constant light, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1992;89:11249–53.
  41. Kim J, Wu HH, Lander AD, et al., GDF11 controls the timing of progenitor cell competence in developing retina, Science, 2005;308:1927–30.
  42. Masuda K, Watanabe I, Unoki K, et al., Functional Rescue of photoreceptors from the damaging effects of constant light by survival-promoting factors in the rat, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1995;36:2142–6.
  43. Liang FQ, Aleman TS, Dejneka NS, et al., Long-term protection of retinal structure but not function using RAAV.CNTF in animal models of retinitis pigmentosa, Mol Ther, 2001;4:461–72.
  44. Whiteley SJ, Klassen H, Coffey PJ, Young MJ, Photoreceptor rescue after low-dose intravitreal IL-1beta injection in the RCS rat, Exp Eye Res, 2001;73:557–68.
  45. Bok D, Yasumura D, Matthes MT, et al., Effects of adenoassociated virus-vectored ciliary neurotrophic factor on retinal structure and function in mice with a P216L rds/peripherin mutation, Exp Eye Res, 2002;74:719–35.
  46. Schmeer C, Straten G, Kugler S, et al., Dose-dependent rescue of axotomized rat retinal ganglion cells by adenovirus-mediated expression of glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor in vivo, Eur J Neurosci, 2002;15:637–43.
  47. Naveh N, Melanocortins applied intravitreally delay retinal dystrophy in Royal College of Surgeons rats, Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2003;241:1044–50.
  48. Friedlander M, Dorrell MI, Ritter MR, et al., Progenitor cells and retinal angiogenesis, Angiogenesis, 2007;10:89–101.
  49. Lau D, McGee LH, Zhou S, et al., Retinal degeneration is slowed in transgenic rats by AAV-mediated delivery of FGF-2, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2000;41:3622–33.
  50. Klassen H, Ziaeian B, Kirov, II, et al., Isolation of retinal progenitor cells from post-mortem human tissue and comparison with autologous brain progenitors, J Neurosci Res, 2004;77:334–43.
  51. Yourey PA, Gohari S, Su JL, Alderson RF, Vascular endothelial cell growth factors promote the in vitro development of rat photoreceptor cells, J Neurosci, 2000;20:6781–8.
  52. Hashimoto T, Zhang XM, Chen BY, Yang XJ, VEGF activates divergent intracellular signaling components to regulate retinal progenitor cell proliferation and neuronal differentiation, Development, 2006;133:2201–10.
  53. Fu QL, Wu W, Wang H, et al., Up-regulated Endogenous Erythropoietin/Erythropoietin Receptor System and Exogenous Erythropoietin Rescue Retinal Ganglion Cells after Chronic Ocular Hypertension, Cell Mol Neurobiol, 2008;28:317–29.
  54. Chan CC, Chew EY, Shen D, et al., Expression of stem cells markers in ocular hemangioblastoma associated with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease, Mol Vis, 2005;11:697–704.
  55. Morimoto T, Miyoshi T, Matsuda S, et al., Transcorneal electrical stimulation rescues axotomized retinal ganglion cells by activating endogenous retinal IGF-1 system, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005;46:2147–55.
  56. Araki M, Suzuki H, Layer P, Differential enhancement of neural and photoreceptor cell differentiation of cultured pineal cells by FGF-1, IGF-1, and EGF, Dev Neurobiol, 2007;67:1641–54.
  57. Azadi S, Johnson LE, Paquet-Durand F, et al., CNTF+BDNF treatment and neuroprotective pathways in the rd1 mouse retina, Brain Res, 2007;1129:116–29.
  58. Zeiss CJ, Allore HG, Towle V, Tao W, CNTF induces dosedependent alterations in retinal morphology in normal and rcd-1 canine retina, Exp Eye Res, 2006;82:395–404.
  59. Fischer AJ, Schmidt M, Omar G, Reh TA, BMP4 and CNTF are neuroprotective and suppress damage-induced proliferation of Muller glia in the retina, Mol Cell Neurosci, 2004;27:531–42.
  60. Zahir T, Klassen H, Young MJ, Effects of ciliary neurotrophic factor on differentiation of late retinal progenitor cells, Stem Cells, 2005;23:424–32.
  61. Turner BA, Sparrow J, Cai B, et al., TrkB/BDNF signaling regulates photoreceptor progenitor cell fate decisions, Dev Biol, 2006;299:455–65.
  62. Gamm DM, Wang S, Lu B, et al., Protection of visual functions by human neural progenitors in a rat model of retinal disease, PLoS ONE, 2007;2:e338.
  63. Papalopulu N, Kintner C, A Xenopus gene, Xbr-1, defines a novel class of homeobox genes and is expressed in the dorsal ciliary margin of the eye, Dev Biol, 1996;174:104–14.
  64. del Cerro M, Notter MF, del Cerro C, et al., Intraretinal transplantation for rod-cell replacement in light-damaged retinas, J Neural Transplant, 1989;1:1–10.
  65. Chacko DM, Rogers JA, Turner JE, Ahmad I, Survival and differentiation of cultured retinal progenitors transplanted in the subretinal space of the rat, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2000;268:842–6.
  66. MacLaren RE, Pearson RA, MacNeil A, et al., Retinal repair by transplantation of photoreceptor precursors, Nature, 2006;444:203–7.
  67. Takahashi M, Palmer TD, Takahashi J, Gage FH, Widespread integration and survival of adult-derived neural progenitor cells in the developing optic retina, Mol Cell Neurosci, 1998;12:340–48.
  68. Carter DA, Dick AD, CD200 maintains microglial potential to migrate in adult human retinal explant model, Curr Eye Res, 2004;28:427–36.
  69. Copland DA, Calder CJ, Raveney BJ, et al., Monoclonal antibody-mediated CD200 receptor signaling suppresses macrophage activation and tissue damage in experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis, Am J Pathol, 2007;171(2):580–88.
  70. Baker DE, Harrison NJ, Maltby E, et al., Adaptation to culture of human embryonic stem cells and oncogenesis in vivo, Nat Biotechnol, 2007;25:207–15.
  71. Longo L, Bygrave A, Grosveld FG, Pandolfi PP, The chromosome make-up of mouse embryonic stem cells is predictive of somatic and germ cell chimaerism, Transgenic Res, 1997;6:321–8.
  72. Sarthy VP, Brodjian SJ, Dutt K, et al., Establishment and characterization of a retinal Muller cell line, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1998;39:212–16.
  73. Limb GA, Salt TE, Munro PM, et al., In vitro characterization of a spontaneously immortalized human Muller cell line (MIO-M1), Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2002;43:864–9.
  74. Lamba DA, Karl MO, Ware CB, Reh TA, Efficient generation of retinal progenitor cells from human embryonic stem cells, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006;103:12769–74.

Further Resources

Share this Article
Related Content In Retina/Vitreous
  • Copied to clipboard!
    accredited arrow-down-editablearrow-downarrow_leftarrow-right-bluearrow-right-dark-bluearrow-right-greenarrow-right-greyarrow-right-orangearrow-right-whitearrow-right-bluearrow-up-orangeavatarcalendarchevron-down consultant-pathologist-nurseconsultant-pathologistcrosscrossdownloademailexclaimationfeedbackfiltergraph-arrowinterviewslinkmdt_iconmenumore_dots nurse-consultantpadlock patient-advocate-pathologistpatient-consultantpatientperson pharmacist-nurseplay_buttonplay-colour-tmcplay-colourAsset 1podcastprinter scenerysearch share single-doctor social_facebooksocial_googleplussocial_instagramsocial_linkedin_altsocial_linkedin_altsocial_pinterestlogo-twitter-glyph-32social_youtubeshape-star (1)tick-bluetick-orangetick-red tick-whiteticktimetranscriptup-arrowwebinar Department Location NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-07NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-08NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-09NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-10NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-11NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-12Salary £ TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-01TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-02TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-03TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-04TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-05TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-06TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-07TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-08TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-09TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-10TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-11TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-12TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-13TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-14TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-15TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-16TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-17TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-18TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-19TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-20TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-21TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-22TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-23TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-24TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-25TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-26TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-27TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-28TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-29TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-30TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-31TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-32TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-33TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-34TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-35TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-36TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-37TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-38TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-39TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-40TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-41TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-42TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-43TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-44TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-45TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-46TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-47TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-48TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-49TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-50TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-51TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-52TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-53TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-54TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-55TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-56TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-57TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-58TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-59TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-60TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-61TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-62TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-63TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-64TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-65TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-66TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-67TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-68TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-69TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-70TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-71TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-72