The Wavefront Revolution in Cataract Surgery

European Ophthalmic Review, 2007:33-4 DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/EOR.2007.00.00.33
Received: January 20, 2011 Accepted January 20, 2011 Citation European Ophthalmic Review, 2007:33-4 DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/EOR.2007.00.00.33

Roughly 250 years after Tadini1 proposed the use of a high-diopter lens implanted into the eye to remedy aphakia, his ideas have been realised imany variations. Intraocular lenses (IOLs), first implanted by Ridley2 in 1949, have become indispensable in the treatment of cataract or very high myopia. Today’s surgeons have myriad lenses to choose from:

• monofocal;
• aspherical;
• refractive multifocal and diffractive multifocal IOLs (mIOLs);
• lenses with square or round optics edges;
• IOLs with two, three or four haptics or a plate haptic;
• hydrophilic, hydrophobic or silicon lens materials; and
• fully transparent lenses and lenses with ultraviolet (UV) and even blue blocking filters.

Each of these choices will have an influence on the post-operative wavefront result and will be discussed in the following article.

Emergence of Wavefronts
The concept of wavefronts refers to waves of light like flat waves on a surface of water. A perfect lens will transform these flat waves into spherical waves with a centre in the focal point, and vice versa. An imperfect lens, on the other hand, will distort these wave patterns and superimpose distortions on these perfect patterns. These distortions are called the wavefront aberrations of the optical system. In order to measure wavefront aberrations in the eye, devices called aberrometers have been developed that use the above principle to quantify the ocular optical distortions. Many different types of aberrometers exist; the most common is the Hartmann-Shack method.3 Comparisons between the different methods and devices have been described in the literature.4,5 Wavefront aberrations are usually well explained within the context of refractive surgery, but remain largely unknown in other fields of ophthalmology because until recently there was no apparent need for it. However, cataract patients have become more demanding and are less willing to accept any post-operative spectacle correction, either for reading or for ametropia. This result can be achieved by a rigorous pre-operative biometry of the cornea, the anterior chamber and the eye as a whole, as well as the implantation of an IOL that remains immobile within the eye after implantation. Only a limited number of IOLs are on the market that can claim such a stable result. However, even with a stable IOL the need to educate the patient about a realistic outcome of the surgery is not eliminated. As an important part of the ocular optics is replaced during the cataract procedure, pre-operative aberrometry is perceived as not being very useful. Wavefront measurements come into play only to evaluate the result after the operation has been performed.

References:
  1. Fechner PU, Fechner MU, Tadini, the man who invented the artificial lens, J Am Intraocul Implant Soc, 1979;5(1):22–3.
  2. Apple DJ, Sims J, Harold Ridley and the Invention of the Intraocular Lens, Surv Ophthalmol, 1996;40(4):279–92.
  3. Liang J, Grimm B, et al., Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor, J Opt Soc Am A, 1994;11(7):1949–57.
  4. Rozema JJ, Van Dyck DEM, Tassignon MJ, Clinical comparison of 6 aberrometers Part 1: Technical specifications, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005;31(6):1114–27.
  5. Rozema JJ, Van Dyck DEM, Tassignon MJ, Clinical comparison of 6 aberrometers Part 2: Statistical comparison in a test group, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006;32(1):33–44.
  6. Artal P, Guirao A, Contributions of the cornea and the lens to the aberrations of the human eye, Opt Lett, 1998;23(21):1713–15.
  7. Artal P, Berrio E, Guirao A, et al., Contribution of the cornea and internal surfaces to the change of ocular aberrations with age, J Opt Soc Am A, 2002;19(1):137–43.
  8. Holladay J, et al, A new intraocular lens design to reduce spherical aberration of pseudophakic eyes, J Refract Surg, 2002;18:683–91.
  9. Marcos S, Barbero S, Jimenez-Alfaro I, Optical quality and depth-of-field of eyes implanted with spherical and aspheric intraocular lenses, J Refract Surg, 2005;21(3):223–35.
  10. Rocha KM, et al., Spherical aberration and depth of focus in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses. A prospective randomized study, Ophthalmology, 2007; in press.
  11. Bellucci R, Scialdone A, Buratto L, et al., Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses: A multicenter randomized study, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005;31(4):712–17.
  12. Denoyer A, et al., Quality of vision after cataract surgery after Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens implantation: effect of contrast sensitivity and wavefront aberration improvements on the quality of daily vision, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2007;33(2):210–16.
  13. Rocha KM, et al., Wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity of aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: a randomized prospective study, Am J Ophthalmol, 2006;142(5):750–56.
  14. Kasper T, Buhren J, Kohnen T, Visual performance of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses: intraindividual comparison of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006;32(12):2022–9.
  15. Marcos S, Rosales P, Llorente L, et al, Change in corneal aberrations after cataract surgery with 2 types of aspherical intraocular lenses, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2007;33(2):217–26.
  16. Kohnen T, Dick B, Jacobi KW, Comparison of the induced astigmatism after temporal clear corneal tunnel incisions of different sizes, J Cataract Refract Surg, 1995;21(4):417–24.
  17. Yao K, Tang X, Ye P, Corneal astigmatism, high order aberrations, and optical quality after cataract surgery: microincision versus small incision, J Refract Surg, 2006;22(Suppl. 9):S1079–82.
  18. Kamlesh, Dadeya S, Kaushik S, Contrast sensitivity and depth of focus with aspheric multifocal versus conventional monofocal intraocular lens, Can J Ophthalmol, 2001;36(4):197–201.
  19. Kohnen T, Allen D, Boureau C et al., European multicenter study of the AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive intraocular lens, Ophthalmology, 2006;113(4):584.
  20. Alfonso JF, et al., Correlation of pupil size with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after implantation of an apodized diffractive intraocular lens, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2007;33(3):430–38.
  21. Alfonso JF, Fernandez-Vega L, Senaris A, et al., Quality of vision with the Acri.Twin asymmetric diffractive bifocal intraocular lens system, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2007;33(2):197–202.
  22. Mrochen M, Semchishen V, From scattering to wavefrontswhat’s in between?, J Refract Surg, 2003;19(5):S597–601.
  23. Tabernero J, Piers P, Benito A, et al., Predicting the optical performance of eyes implanted with IOLs to correct spherical aberration, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006;47(10):4651–8.
  24. De Groot V, Leysen I, Neuhann T, et al., One-year follow-up of bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens implantation in 60 eyes, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006;32(10):1632–7.
  25. Verbruggen KHM, et al., IOL centration and visual outcome after bag-in-the-lens implantation, J Cataract Refract Surg, in press.
  26. Dietze HH, Cox MJ, Limitations of correcting spherical aberration with aspheric intraocular lenses, J Refract Surg, 2005;21(5):S541–6
  27. Piers PA, Weeber HA, Artal P, et al., Theoretical comparison of aberration-correcting customized and aspheric intraocular lenses, J Refract Surg, 2007;23(4):374–84.